<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Intake Sediment Management]]></title><description><![CDATA[Intake Sediment Management]]></description><link>https://www.intakesediment.com/blog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:26:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.intakesediment.com/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Ten Options for Sediment Management at Intakes]]></title><description><![CDATA[This first article in the series will look at ten options available when sediment ingress at an intake is problematic.  They are ordered from upstream in the river catchment to downstream in irrigation canals.  It concludes with a Preliminary Screening Matrix giving some advantages and disadvantages for each option, the kind of sediments it controls and a generalised ‘traffic light’ assessment. The options are: 1. Catchment conservation 2. Location of river Intakes  3. River training to...]]></description><link>https://www.intakesediment.com/post/ten-options-for-sediment-management-at-intakes</link><guid isPermaLink="false">69e77cca609e28a4f9efbccf</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 19:03:44 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a6a2a5_4ff618af982a466aa829509681d87681~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_1000,h_1000,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>Edmund Atkinson</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>